Ghost
Writers
I’m certain you’ve seen them in book departments; newly
released books by authors you know are no longer with us. Of course sometimes
they are simply reissues of older titles, and a check of the copyright date
will confirm this, but many times they truly are new stories supposedly
written by long-gone authors. I know V.C. Andrews continued to write best-sellers
long after her demise, as did western author Louis L’Amour. More recently, one
of my all-time favorite authors Janet Dailey, who passed a few years ago, has
had new releases on the shelf. At first I thought it might be these were stories
written before the author died and just hadn’t been published yet, but as the
years have gone by and new titles have continued to appear, I have to figure
the publisher knew a good thing and wasn’t ready to let it go.
In the case of Mr. L’Amour, he not only published but
did leave behind a vast body of work that was never published, or had been published
in his early author days. From what I gleaned in reading articles about him,
they were stories he did not feel were worthy of publication or reissue. Yet
the money to be had from bringing them out after he was gone was apparently too
much to resist.
I was a huge fan of Janet Dailey and back in the day
read her Harlequin Presents Romances that were set in all 50 states, as well as
many of her single titles and the Calder Family books. I recognize those books
when they are re-released, but others do have new copyright dates. I’ve bought
one or two titles, just to see how closely they adhere to Janet’s writing
style, but something tells me they won’t be the same. Anymore than those old
stories written by a young struggling author in the days of pulp fiction are
the same as the sagas and classic westerns Louis L’Amour wrote in his heyday.
While fans are happy to see these new titles (how many
people even realize the author is gone?), I have to wonder, how would the
authors themselves feel about others writing under their names? Would Louis L’Amour
be upset that the stories he never wanted to see the light of day are now
published? How would Janet Dailey like it that someone else is writing about
the characters she created and trying to emulate the stories she crafted? Should we have respect for authors so that
when they do pass their work is protected from imitators? Should we honor the
wishes of authors who do not want their earlier efforts subjected to the public
eye? I do remember that the great mystery author Agatha Christie killed off her
main character, Hercule Poirot, when she no longer would write about him, to
prevent another author or publisher from discovering his marketability.
Not that I will ever put myself in the same category
as these writers, but I would like to think any stories I banished to the
bottom drawer of the file cabinet would remain there after I’m gone (and perhaps even go to the shredder). Neither
would I want my characters, the ones I labored to create, to become the
property of another writer. In the end, it should be about respect and not how
much profit can be made from putting books out there after an author has gone
to that great bookstore in the sky.